Bluetti vs Anker: Comparing Capacity, Charge Cycles, and Power Output
Bluetti vs Anker: How Do They Compare?
Bluetti and Anker have established themselves as leaders in portable power, but how do they compare when you evaluate their products side-by-side? Which brand can truly meet your needs?
In this post, we’ll do a comprehensive portable power station review of both brands and look at key features like capacity, battery charge cycles, power output and charging options.
Bluetti EB3A vs Anker 521
- [Tiny but Mighty] – With a 600W AC inverter, 268Wh…
- [Ultra-fast Charging] – No bulky power brick, a…
- [Harness the Power of Sun] – The built-in MPPT…
- [Reliable UPS] – EB3A instantly provides backup…
- 10 Years of Long-Lasting Power: Anker 521 Portable…
- USB-C Port Built In: Ditch bulky adapters and use…
- 600W of Upgraded Power: Anker 521 Portable Power…
- 256Wh Capacity for Weekend Trips: When you’re…
What types of devices can Bluetti EB3A and Anker 521 charge?
- 40W Mini Fridge 5.2 hours
- 40Wh Drone 5.1 hours
- 13Wh Smartphone 15 times
How are Bluetti EB3A vs Anker 521 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both the Bluetti EB3A and Anker 521 have LiFePO4 batteries, known for their longevity and safety.
2. WiFi Connectivity
- Neither Bluetti EB3A or Anker 521 can connect to WiFi.
- This means that they cannot receive automatic updates and security patches.
How are Bluetti EB3A vs Anker 521 different?
1. Capacity
- Bluetti EB3A has slightly more storage capacity.
- Bluetti EB3A has capacity of 268Wh, compared to the Anker 521’s 256Wh.
2. Charge Cycles (Battery Life)
- Anker 521 has more charge / discharge cycles, and longer battery life.
- Bluetti EB3A has 2,500 charge cycles, while the Anker 521 offers more at 3,000 charge cycles.
3. Output Power
- Bluetti EB3A has higher power output.
- Bluetti EB3A has output of 600-Watts (1,200-Watts surge), while the Anker 521 has output of 300-Watts (600-Watts surge).
4. Charge Time
- Anker 521 charges faster when plugged into an AC wall outlet or USB-C port.
- Anker 521 charges in 2.5 hours via AC outlet, while the Bluetti EB3A takes 5 hours to charge.
- Anker 521 charges in 1.5 hours via USB-C, while the Bluetti EB3A charges in about 1.7 hours via AC + Solar panel.
5. Outlets/Ports
- Bluetti EB3A has more outlets and ports to plug devices into.
- Bluetti EB3A has 9 outlets and ports, including a 100W USB-C and a 15W wireless pad, while the Anker 521 has 6 outlets and ports, with a lower output USB-C port (60W) and no wireless pad.
6. Dimensions
- Anker 521 is smaller and more compact.
- Anker 521 measures 8.5 x 8.3 x 5.7 inches, while the Bluetti EB3A is larger with dimensions of 10.0 x 7.0 x 7.2 inches.
7. Weight
- Bluetti EB3A is more lightweight.
- Bluetti EB3A weighs 6.6 lbs, whereas the Anker 521 is heavier at 8.2 lbs.
8. Bluetooth
- Bluetti EB3A is Bluetooth-enabled.
- Bluetti EB3A supports Bluetooth, while the Anker 521 does not.
9. Warranty
- Anker 521 has a a longer warranty.
- Anker 521 has 5-year warranty, while the Bluetti EB3A comes with a 2-year warranty.
10. Bluetti EB3A vs Anker 521 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti EB3A | Anker 521 |
Capacity | 268Wh | 256Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 2,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 600W (1,200 surge) | 300W (600W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 5 hours | 2.5 Hrs |
DC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | 1.2 to 1.7 hours (AC + Solar) | 1.5 hours (USB-C) |
Solar Input | unknown | 65W Max |
Outlets / Ports | 9 Outlets & Ports – 2 x AC (120V/5A) – 2 x DC (12V) – 2 x USB-A (5V/3A) – 1 x USB-C (100W) – 1 x 12V DC (12V/10A) – 1 x Wireless Pad (15W) | 6 Outlets & Ports – 2 x AC (120V/5A) – 2 x USB-A (2.4A /port) – 1 x USB-C (60W) – 1 x DC Carport |
Dimensions | 10.0 x 7.0 x 7.2 inches | 8.5 x 8.3 x 5.7 inches |
Weight | 6.6 lbs | 8.2 lbs |
Bluetooth | Yes | No |
WiFi | No | No |
Warranty | 2 years | 5 years |
Bluetti EB55 vs Anker 535
- [Camping Game Changer] – With 537Wh LFP cells and…
- [13 Versatile Outlets] – 100W PD for superfast…
- [Dual Recharging] – Support dual recharging by…
- [Small But Pack a Punch] – The lunch-box-size…
- 6x Longer-Lasting: Rated to provide 3000 charge…
- Unprecedented 10-Year Lifespan: Instead of 2…
- Extra USB-C Port: Recharge to 80% in under 2.5…
- 9 Ports for All: The power station has all the…
What types of devices can Bluetti EB55 and Anker 535 charge?
- 10Wh Smartphone 50 times
- 120W Electric blanket 3.8 hours
- 200W Slow Cooker 2.2 hours
How are Bluetti EB55 and Anker 535 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both power stations use LiFePO4 batteries.
- LiFePO4 technology is known for longer battery life and enhanced safety.
2. Capacity
- Both models have similar storage capacities.
- Bluetti EB55 has capacity of 537Wh and the Anker 535 has 512Wh.
3. Charging Time
- Both models take 3 to 4 hours to fully charge when plugged into an AC wall outlet.
4. Weight and Size
- The power stations are nearly identical in weight and size.
- Bluetti EB55 weighs 16.6 lbs and the Anker 535 weighs 16.8 lbs, and their dimensions are fairly close as well.
5. Connectivity Options
- Neither model supports Bluetooth or WiFi.
- This means that neither power station can be remotely managed or receive automatic firmware updates.
How are Bluetti EB55 and Anker 535 different?
1. Output Power
- Bluetti EB55 has more output power.
- Bluetti EB55 has output of 700-Watts (1400-Watts surge), compared to the Anker 535’s 50-Watts (750-Watts surge).
2. Charge Cycles
- Anker 535 has more charge cycles and longer battery life.
- Anker 535 has 3,000 battery charge cycles, compared to the Bluetti EB55’s 2,500 cycles.
3. Outlets and Ports
- Bluetti EB55 has more outlets & ports, with more options to plug-in devices.
- Bluetti EB55 has 13 outlets and ports, including a wireless charging pad. In comparison, the Anker 535 has 9 outlets and ports.
4. Alternate Charging Options
- Bluetti EB55 provides more alternative ways to recharge the battery, in addition to the standard charging methods.
- Bluetti EB55 provides two extra ways to recharge its lithium battery, including the ability to charge using AC + solar and a gas generator. The Anker 535 has one additional way to recharge, using a fast charge USB-C port.
5. Warranty
- Anker 535 has longer warranty coverage.
- Anker 535 has 5 year warranty coverage, compared to the Bluetti EB55’s 2-year warranty.
6. Bluetti EB55 vs Anker 535 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti EB55 | Anker 535 |
Capacity | 537Wh | 512Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 2,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 700W (1,400 surge) | 500W (750W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | 3 to 4 hours |
DC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 2 to 3 hours (AC + Solar) – 3 to 4 hours (Gas Generator) | 2 hours (USB-C) |
Solar Input | 120W Max | |
Outlets / Ports | 13 Outlets & Ports – 4x AC (120V/5A) – 4x USB-A Port (5V / 3A) – 1x USB-C Port (100W) – 1x Carport (12V/10A) – 2x DC5521 – 1x Wireless Pad (15W) | 9 Outlets & Ports – 4 x AC (110V/4.54A) – 3 x USB-A (2.4A /Port) – 1 x USB-C (60W) – 1 x 12V Carport (120W Max) |
Dimensions | 10.9 x 7.8 x 7.7 inches | 11.5 x 9.9 x 7.4 inches |
Weight | 16.6 lbs | 16.8 lbs (7.6 kg) |
Bluetooth | No | No |
WiFi | No | No |
Warranty | 2 years | 5 years |
Bluetti EB705 vs Anker SOLIX C800
- [Great Capacity to Size Ratio] – With 716Wh LFP…
- [Power All Loads for the Road] – EB70S has…
- [Fast Recharging] – With the built-in MPPT…
- [2500+ Life Cycles to 80%] – The solar generator…
- Fully Power Multiple Appliances: No more…
- More Power and More Ports: Plug in up to 10…
- Never Lose Gear with Built-In Storage: No more…
- Power Every Day for 10 Years: Thanks to…
What types of devices can Bluetti EB705 and Anker SOLIX C800 charge?
- 10W Smartphone 48 times
- 60W Mini Fridge 11 hours
- 120W Electric blanket 8 hours
How are Bluetti EB705 vs Anker SOLIX C800 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both models have LiFePO4 batteries.
How are Bluetti EB705 vs Anker SOLIX C800 different?
1. Capacity
- Anker SOLIX C800 has slightly more storage capacity.
- Anker SOLIX C800 has capacity of 768Wh, versus the Bluetti EB705’s capacity of 716Wh.
2. Output Power
- Anker SOLIX C800 has a lot more output power.
- Anker SOLIX C800 has output power of 1,200W (1,600W surge), compared to the Bluetti EB705’s 800W output(1,400W surge).
3. Charging Time
- Anker SOLIX C800 charges faster via AC wall outlet.
- Anker SOLIX C800 charges within 60 minutes compared to Bluetti EB705’s 3-4 hours.
4. Outlets and Ports
- Bluetti EB705 provides more outlets and ports, while the Anker SOLIX C800 has RV ports.
- Bluetti EB705 has 11 outlets and ports, while the Anker SOLIX C800 10 outlets and ports, including NEMA outlets.
5. Connectivity Options
- Anker SOLIX C800 has full connectivity features and can be remotely managed.
- Anker SOLIX C800 has Bluetooth and WiFi, while the Bluetti EB705 does not.
6. Warranty
- Anker provides a longer warranty coverage.
- Anker SOLIX C800 has a 5 year warranty, and the Bluetti EB705 has 2 years coverage.
7. Weight
- Bluetti EB705 is slightly more lightweight.
- Bluetti EB705 weighs about 21 lbs, and the Anker SOLIX C800 weighs approx 23 lbs.
8. Dimensions
- Bluetti EB705 is smaller and more compact.
- Bluetti EB705 has dimensions of 12.6 x 8.5 x 8.7 inches, and the Anker SOLIX C800’s size is 14.6 x 8.0 x 9.9 inches.
9. Bluetti EB705 vs Anker SOLIX C800 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti EB705 | Anker SOLIX C800 |
Capacity | 716Wh | 768Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 2,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 800W (1,400 surge) | 1,200W (1,600W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | 60 minutes |
DC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 4 to 4.5 hours (Gas Generator) | none |
Solar Input | 200W Max | 300W Max |
Outlets / Ports | 11 Outlets & Ports – 4 x AC (120V/5A) – 2 x USB-C PD (100W) – 2 x USB-A (5V/3A) – 2 x regulated DC (12V/10A) – 1 DC Carport (12V/24V) – 1 x Wireless Pad (15W) | 10 Outlets & Ports – 5 x NEMA (5-15R 120V) – 2 x USB-A (12W /port) – 1 x USB-C (30W) – 1 x USB-C (100W) – 1 x Carport (120W) |
Dimensions | 12.6 x 8.5 x 8.7 inches | 14.6 x 8.0 x 9.9 inches |
Weight | 21.4 lbs | 23.1 lbs |
Bluetooth | No | Yes |
WiFi | No | Yes |
Warranty | 2 years | 5 years |
Bluetti AC180 vs Anker SOLIX C1000
- [Charged in 1 Hour] – The AC180 packs a 1152Wh…
- [Power All Your Needs] – The AC180 boasts 1800W…
- [Solar Fast Charge] – Built-in MPPT charge…
- [Reliable UPS] – More than an outdoor power…
- Charge Up in a Flash: Achieve 80% battery capacity…
- A Decade of Power: Trust in a decade-long journey…
- Powerhouse Versatility: The Anker SOLIX C1000’s…
- Harness the Sun’s Energy: Embrace an eco-conscious…
What types of devices can Bluetti AC180 and Anker SOLIX C1000 charge?
- 500W Hair Dryer 1 to 2 hours
- 100W Projector 7 to 9 hours
- 80W Mini Fridge 14 to 16 hours
How are Bluetti AC180 and Anker SOLIX C1000 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both power stations have LiFePO4 batteries.
2. Output Power
- Both power stations have the same output.
- Bluetti AC180 and Anker SOLIX both have output of 1800W.
3. Connectivity Options
- Both models support WiFi.
- The power stations can be remotely managed and receive automatic software updates.
4. Warranty
- Both have 5-year warranty coverage.
5. Outlets and Ports
- Each unit has 11 outlets and ports.
How are Bluetti AC180 and Anker SOLIX C1000 different?
1. Capacity
- Bluetti AC180 has a slightly higher storage capacity.
- Bluetti AC180 has capacity of 1,152Wh compared to the Anker SOLIX C1000’s 1,056Wh.
2. Charge Cycles
- Bluetti AC180 has more charge cycles and longer battery lifespan.
- Bluetti AC180 3,500 charge cycles, compared to Anker SOLIX C1000’s 3,000 cycles.
3. Charging Time
- Anker SOLIX C1000 charges faster via AC wall outlet, while the Bluetti AC180 provides extra ways to recharge.
- Anker SOLIX C1000 charges within 1 hour when plugged into an AC outlet, while the Bluetti AC180 takes 2 hours.
- In addition to AC, solar and DC charging, the Bluetti AC180 can be charged using a gas generator.
4. Weight
- Anker SOLIX C1000 is more lightweight and easier to transport.
- Anker SOLIX C1000 weighs about 28 lbs, compared to the Bluetti AC180’s weight of approx 37 lbs.
5. Connectivity Options
- Anker SOLIX C1000 can connect to a smartphone via Bluetooth, while the Bluetti AC180 does not.
6. Bluetti EB705 vs Anker SOLIX C800 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti AC180 | Anker SOLIX C1000 |
Capacity | 1,152Wh | 1,056Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 3,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 1800W (2700W Surge) | 1800W (2400W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 2 hours | 1 hour |
DC Charging Time | 5.3 to 6 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 1.3 to 2 hours (Gas Generator) | none |
Solar Input | 500W Max | 600W Max |
Outlets / Ports | 11 Outlets & Ports – 4 x AC (120V/5A) – 4 x USB-A (5V/3A) – 1 x USB-C (60W) – 1 x Wireless Pads (15W) – 1x Carport (12V) | 11 Outlets & Ports – 6 x AC (120V~ 15A) – 2 x USB-A (5V 2.4A /Port) – 1 x USB-C (100W /Port) – 1 x USB-C (30W /Port) – 1 x Carport (12V 10A) |
Dimensions | 13.4 × 9.7 × 12.5 inches | 14.8 x 8.0 x 10.5 inches |
Weight | 37.4 lbs (16.96 kg) | 28.4 lbs (12.9 kg) |
Bluetooth | No | Yes |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Bluetti AC200P vs Anker SOLIX F1200
- [Power Monster] – With the remarkable 2000Wh of…
- [3500+ Life Cycles to 80%] – The ultra-safe…
- [Efficient Recharging Rate] – AC200P supports up…
- [17 Versatile Outlets] – 6 AC ports, standard…
- Long-Lasting Portable Power Station With a 10-Year…
- 5-Year Full-Device Warranty: Instead of an average…
- Exceptionally Fast Recharge: Instead of taking 5.6…
- Ultra-Powerful Capacity: With a 1229Wh capacity…
What types of devices can Bluetti AC200P and Anker SOLIX F1200 charge?
- 10Wh Phone 150 to 170 times
- 60W Mini Fridge 20 to 28 times
- 1800W Electric Vehicle 11 miles
How are Bluetti AC200P and Anker SOLIX F1200 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both units use LiFePO4 battery technology.
- LiFePO4 provides more charge cycles, longer lifespan and enhanced safety features.
How are Bluetti AC200P and Anker SOLIX F1200 different?
1. Capacity
- Bluetti AC200P has larger storage capacity.
- Bluetti AC200P has capacity of 2,000Wh, compared to 1,229Wh for the Anker SOLIX F1200.
2. Output Power
- Bluetti AC200P has more output power.
- Bluetti AC200P has output of 2000W (4800W surge), versus 1800W output and 2400W surge for the Anker SOLIX F1200.
3. Recharge Time
- Anker SOLIX F1200 charges faster when connected to an AC outlet.
- Anker SOLIX F1200 charges in 1.5 hours, compared to the Bluetti AC200P’s 3 to 4 hours.
4. Outlets & Ports
- Bluetti AC200P provides a lot more options to plugin devices.
- Bluetti AC200P has 17 outlets and ports, compared to Anker SOLIX F1200’s 13 outlets and ports.
5. Weight
- Anker SOLIX F1200 is much more lightweight.
- Anker SOLIX F1200 weighs about 42 lbs, and the Bluetti AC200P weighs about 60 lbs.
6. Connectivity Options
- Anker SOLIX F1200 can be remotely controlled using Bluetooth.
- Anker is Bluetooth enabled, while the Bluetti does not.
7. Warranty
- Anker SOLIX F1200 has longer warranty coverage.
- Anker SOLIX F1200 has a 5 year warranty, and Bluetti AC200P has 4 years of coverage.
8. Bluetti AC200P vs Anker SOLIX F1200 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti AC200P | Anker SOLIX F1200 |
Capacity | 2,000Wh | 1,229Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 3,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 2000W (4,800 surge) | 1800W (2400W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 3 to 4 hours | 1.5 hours |
DC Charging Time | 10 to 20 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 2.2 to 2.7 hours (AC + Solar) – 2.5 to 3 hours (AC + AC) – 2.1 to 2.5 hours (Solar + Solar) | none |
Solar Input | 700W Max | 600W Max |
Outlets / Ports | 17 Outlets & Ports – 6x AC (120V/5A) – 4x USB-A (5V/3A) – 1x USB-C PD (60W) – 2x Wireless Pads (15W) – 2x DC5521 (12V/3A) – 1x Car port (12V) – 1x DC RV (12V/25A) | 13 Outlets & Ports – 6 x AC (110V) – 4 x USB-A (5V 2.4A /Port) – 1 x USB-C (100W /Port) – 1 x USB-C (60W /Port) – 1 x Carport (12V / 10A) |
Dimensions | 16.5 x 11.0 x 15.2 inches | 18.2 x 11.3 x 9.3 inches |
Weight | 60.6 lbs (27.5 kg) | 42.1 lbs (22.1 kg) |
Bluetooth | No | Yes |
WiFi | No | No |
Warranty | 4 years | 5 years |
Bluetti AC200MAX vs Anker SOLIX F2000
- [Powerful Beast] – AC200MAX power station comes…
- [Expandable Capacity] – AC200MAX supports 2…
- [Super Fast Charging] – AC200MAX supports dual…
- [16 Ports for All Needs] – Besides AC/USB/Car…
- [What You Get] – BLUETTI AC200MAX portable power…
- [Longest-Lasting 10-Year Lifespan] – With…
- [Rapid Recharge] – Thanks to HyperFlash…
- [Power Up to 12 Devices] – The 2400W output and an…
- [5-Year Full-Device Warranty] – Anker PowerHouse…
- [What You Get] – Anker SOLIX F2000 Portable Power…
What types of devices can Bluetti AC200MAX and Anker SOLIX F2000 charge?
- 1500W Heater 1.1 hour
- 900W Refrigerator 2 hours
- 1300W Lawn Mower 2 to 4 hours
How are Bluetti AC200MAX and Anker SOLIX F2000 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Each model uses LiFePO4 batteries.
2. Capacity
- Both models have the same base capacity, while the Bluetti AC200MAX has larger expansion options.
- Bluetti AC200MAX and Anker SOLIX F2000 have base capacity of 2,048Wh.
- However, the Bluetti AC200MAX’s capacity can be expanded up to 8,000Wh, and Anker SOLIX F2000 expands up to 4,096Wh.
3. Connectivity Options
- Both models support Bluetooth.
- Bluetti AC200MAX and Anker SOLIX F2000 can be remotely controlled using your smartphone.
How are Bluetti AC200MAX and Anker SOLIX F2000 different?
1. Expansion Options
- Bluetti AC200MAX has larger expansion options.
- Bluetti AC200MAX’s capacity expands up to 8kWh, doubling the Anker SOLIX F2000’s maximum expansion of 4,096Wh.
2. Output Power
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has more output power.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has 2400W output (3600W surge), and Bluetti AC200MAX has output of 2200W (4800W surge).
3. Recharge Time
- Anker SOLIX F2000 charges much faster via AC outlet.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 charges within 1.8 hours, compared to Bluetti AC200MAX’s 4.5 hours.
4. Outlets & Ports
- Bluetti AC200MAX has more ways to plugin devices.
- Bluetti AC200MAX has 16 outlets & ports, and the Anker SOLIX F2000 has 12 outlets & ports.
5. WiFi Connectivity
- Bluetti AC200MAX can connect to WiFi.
- This allows the Bluetti AC200MAX to receive automatic software updates.
6. Weight
- Bluetti AC200MAX is a few pounds lighter.
- Bluetti AC200MAX weighs 61.9 lbs, while the Anker SOLIX F2000 is heavier at 67.2 lbs.
7. Warranty
- Anker SOLIX F2000 offers longer warranty coverage.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has a 5 year warranty, compared to Bluetti AC200MAX’s 2 year warranty.
8. Bluetti AC200MAX vs Anker SOLIX F2000 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti AC200MAX | Anker SOLIX F2000 |
Capacity | 2,048Wh (expands to 8kWh) | 2,048Wh (expands to 4,096Wh) |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 3,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 2,200W (4,800 surge) | 2,400W (3,600W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 4.5 hours | 1.2 to 1.8 hours |
DC Charging Time | 5 to 6 hours | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 2 hours (AC + Solar) – 2.5 hours (AC + AC) | none |
Solar Input | 900W | 1000W |
Outlets / Ports | 16 Outlets & Ports – 4 x AC Outlets – 2 x USB-A (5V/3A) – 2 x USB-A (18W) – 2 x DC521 (10A) – 2 x Wireless Pads (15W) – 1 x USB-C (100W) – 1 x DC (12V /30A) – 1 x Carport – 1 x 30A NEMA TT-30 RV Port | 12 Outlets & Ports – 4 x AC Outlets – 3 x USB-C (100W /port) – 2 x USB-A (2.4A /port) – 2 x DC Carports – 1 x TT-30 RV Port |
Dimensions | 16.5 x 11.0 x 15.2 inches | 20.7 x 15.5 x 9.8 inches |
Weight | 61.9 lbs (28.08 kg) | 67.2 lbs (30.5 kgs) |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Warranty | 2 years | 5 years |
Bluetti AC300 + B300 vs Anker SOLIX F3800
- [Expandable Capacity] – AC300 supports up to 4…
- [16 Versatile Ports] – The NEMA TT-30 is perfect…
- [Best RV Power] – Besides the AC outlets, wireless…
- [24/7 UPS Home Backup] – Tie the AC300&B300K power…
- [What You Get] – BLUETTI AC300 power station,…
- Enlarged Capacity From 3.84kWh: Anker SOLIX F3800…
- Dual-Voltage for Any Appliance: No more…
- Directly Charge Your EV: You don’t need…
- Directly Power Your RV: Just plug Anker SOLIX…
- 5-Year Warranty, 10-Year Lifespan: Anker SOLIX…
What types of devices can Bluetti AC300 + B300 and Anker SOLIX F3800 charge?
- 1500W Heater 1.7 to 3 hours
- 1000W Clothes Washer 2.6 to 4 hours
- 8000 BTU Air Conditioner 3 to 5 hours
How are Bluetti AC300 + B300 and Anker SOLIX F3800 similar?
1. Battery Type
- Both have LiFePO4 batteries.
2. Connectivity Options
- Both models offer Bluetooth and WiFi.
How are Bluetti AC300 + B300 and Anker SOLIX F3800 different?
1. Capacity and Expansion Options
- Anker SOLIX F3800 has larger base storage capacity.
- Anker SOLIX F3800 starts at 3,840Wh capacity and Bluetti AC300 + B300 with 3,072Wh of capacity.
2. Expansion Options
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 has expandable capacity.
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 capacity can expand up to 12.2kWh, but Anker SOLIX F3800 cannot.
3. Output Power
- Anker SOLIX F3800 offers more output power.
- Anker SOLIX F3800 has output of 6000W a(9000W surge), compared to Bluetti AC300 + B300’s 3000W output (6000W surge).
4. Recharge Time
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 recharges faster via AC outlet.
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 recharges in 1.5 hours, while Anker SOLIX F3800 takes about 2.6 hours.
5. Outlets & Ports
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 has more outlets & ports.
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 has 16 outlets & ports, while the Anker SOLIX F3800 14 outlets & ports.
6. Weight
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 is lot more lightweight and easier to transport.
- Bluetti AC300 + B300 weighs 60 lbs, while the Anker SOLIX F3800 weighs 132 lbs.
7. Warranty
- Anker SOLIX F3800 has longer warranty coverage.
- Anker SOLIX F3800 has a 5 year warranty, compared to Bluetti AC300 + B300’s 4 year warranty.
8. Bluetti AC300 + B300 vs Anker SOLIX F3800 Comparison Table
Features | Bluetti AC300 + B300 | Anker SOLIX F3800 |
Capacity | 3,072Wh (expands to 12.2kWh) | 3,840Wh |
Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Charge Cycles | 3,500 | 3,000 |
Power Output | 3,000W (6,000W Surge) | 6000W (9000W surge) |
AC Charging Time | 1.5 to 3 hours | 2.6 hours |
DC Charging Time | unknown | unknown |
Alternate Charging Time | – 2 hours (AC + Solar) | none |
Solar Input | 2400W | 2400W |
Outlets / Ports | 16 Outlets & Ports – 6 x AC – 1 x 12V RV Port (30A) – 2 x USB-A Port (18W) – 2 x USB-A Port 5V/3A – 1 x USB-C Port (100W) – 2 x Wireless Pads (15W) – 1 x NEMA TT-30 (30A) – 1 x 12V DC carport (10A) | 14 Outlets & Ports – 6 x AC Outlets (120V~20A) – 3 x USB-C (100W /port) – 2 x USB-A (12W /port) – 1 x DC Carport (12V⎓10A) – 1 x NEMA 14-50 RV Port – 1 x NEMA L14-30R RV Port |
Dimensions | 20.5 x 12.5 x 14.1 inches | 27.6 x 15.3 x 15.6 inches |
Weight | 60.6 lbs (27.5 kg) | 132.32 lbs (60 kg) |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Warranty | 4 years | 5 years |