If you’re prepping for unpredictable weather, power outages, or outdoor adventures, a portable power station is a must-have! These devices ensure that your important gear stays charged, even when disconnected from the power grid.
Enter the contenders: Bluetti AC200Max vs Anker SOLIX F2000. In this article, we’ll analyze each of these backup battery, including battery, capacity, output, outlets & ports, recharge time, and unique features.
By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear picture of how these two power stations compare to each other and which is the best investment for your needs. If you want to learn more about Bluetti vs Anker, read our full comparison guide.
Key Takeaways:
- Bluetti AC200Max has more capacity than the Anker SOLIX F2000.
- Bluetti AC200Max and Anker SOLIX F2000 have similar output power.
- Bluetti AC200Max has more outlets and ports.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 charges faster.
Bluetti AC200Max vs Anker SOLIX F2000: How Do They Compare?
Bluetti AC200Max has more expandable battery capacity.
- The Bluetti AC200Max expands from 2,048Wh up to 8,192Wh. The Bluetti AC200Max has more potential for energy storage, compared to the Anker SOLIX F2000 which expands to a maximum of 4,096Wh.
The Anker SOLIX F2000 has slightly more continuous AC output, while the Bluetti AC200Max has more surge power.
- The Anker SOLIX F2000 has AC output of 2400W, and the Bluetti AC200Max has AC output of 2200W with surge of 4800W.
Bluetti AC200Max has more charge cycles and a longer battery life.
- The Bluetti is estimated to provide 3,500 charge cycles before the battery begins to degrade. This is compared to 3,000 cycles for the Anker SOLIX F2000.
Bluetti AC200Max has more outlets and ports.
- The Bluetti AC200Max has 16, while the Anker SOLIX F2000 has 11.
- Bluetti AC200Max is a little more lightweight. The Bluetti is more lightweight at 61.9 lbs, compared to the Anker’s 67.3 pounds.
- Bluetti AC200Max has a touchscreen control panel. This subtle, very cool feature that makes Bluetti easier to adjust, with a user-friendly LCD touchscreen.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 is more ergonomic. Even though the Anker is heavier than the Bluetti, it compensates for this with an ergonomic design, wheels, and a telescoping handle, improving its portability.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has overall faster recharge times. The Anker SOLIX F2000 recharges within 1.4 hours when plugged into an AC wall outlet, compared to 4-5 hours for the Bluetti. Similarly, its solar recharge time is quicker at 2.5 hours compared to 3 hours for the Bluetti.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 accepts a higher maximum input for both AC (1440W Max) and solar (1000W Max). The Anker SOLIX F2000 high AC and solar input are the reason it’s able to charge so quickly. In comparison, the Bluetti AC200Max supports up to 500 watts for AC and 900 watts for solar.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has a longer warranty. The Anker SOLIX F2000 comes with a 5 year warranty, compared to 4 years for the Bluetti AC200Max.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has UPS capability. The Anker provides an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) feature, with a 20 millisecond automatic rollover to provide seamless power in the event of a power outage.
- Anker SOLIX F2000 has a wider temperature range. The Anker can be operated and stored in colder conditions down to -4°F, compared to the Bluetti’s limit of 32°F.
Bluetti AC200Max Diagram
Anker SOLIX F2000 diagram
Bluetti AC200Max vs Anker SOLIX F2000: Comparison Chart
| Features | Bluetti AC200Max | Anker SOLIX F2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Battery Capacity | 2,048Wh expandable to 8,192Wh | 2048Wh (expandable to 4096Wh) |
| AC Output | 2200W | 2400W |
| Surge | 4800W | n/a |
| Output Ports | 16 total: 4 x AC Outlets 2 x 18W USB-A 2 x Quick Charge USB-A 1 x 100W USB-C 2 x 15W Wireless Charging Pads 1 x 30A NEMA TT-30 1 x Carport 1 x 12V/30A Super DC 2 x DC5521 | 11 total: 2 x AC ports 1 x TT-30R AC Port 1 x NEMA-20R AC Port 3 x USB-C ports (100W Max Per Port) 2 x USB-A ports (2.4A Max Per Port) 2 x car outlets |
| AC Input | 500 watts maximum | 1440W Max |
| Solar Input | 900 watts maximum | 1000W Max |
| AC Recharge Time | 4-5 hours | 1.4 hours |
| Solar Recharge Time | 3 hours | 2.5 hours |
| DC Recharge Time | ||
| Alternate Recharge Time | AC + Solar: 2 hours AC + AC: 2.5 hours | n/a |
| Charge Cycles | 3,500 | 3,000 |
| Dimensions | 16.5 × 11.0 × 15.2 inches (420 * 280 * 386.5 mm) | 20.67″L x 9.84″W x 15.55″H |
| Weight | 61.9 lbs | 67.3 Pounds (30.5 kg) |
| Operating / Storage Temperature | 32-104 ℉ (0-40℃) | -4°F-104°F / -20°C-40°C |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Pass Through Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 4-years | 5-Year |
| Additional Features | LCD Touchscreen | Ergonomic design, wheels, telescoping handle, 20 millisecond Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) |
Resources